nat 0 ACL and static nat

IPsec, L2TP, Split tunneling, PPTP and all other VPN related posts.
Guest

nat 0 ACL and static nat

Post by Guest » Sun May 20, 2007 6:13 pm


All,I have nat 0 ACL stating an ip address should not be natted, while a static nat statement saying it should be natted. Just want to know which one will take precedence.Thanks,

Guest

Re:nat 0 ACL and static nat

Post by Guest » Sun May 20, 2007 6:38 pm


This  is the nat order of operation  PIX/ASA.the NAT (nameif) 0 acl_name takes precedence.1. nat 0 access-list (nat-exempt) 2. Match existing xlates 3. Match static commands a. Static NAT with and without access-list b. Static PAT with and without access-list 4. Match nat commands a. nat [id] access-list (first match) b. nat [id] [address] [mask] (best match) i. If the ID is 0, create an identity xlate ii. Use global pool for dynamic NAT iii. Use global pool for dynamic PAT

cialis tadalafil

hello guos 9128738514

Post by cialis tadalafil » Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:06 am

hello guos 9128738514

Post Reply